Man of Steel
Poor Warner Brothers. They had the Batman franchise, but their other super heroes just weren't catching on with the public. Their attempt to revive Superman in 2006 with Bryan Singer was considered a failure (because it made only $400 million! Yeesh, how greedy can you get!). Their attempts at jumpstarting franchises with their other big guns like 2011's Green Lantern fared even worse. Meanwhile, Marvel was destroying box office records with their second stringers, guys like Thor and Iron Man. And when The Avengers became one of the biggest blockbusters of all time, DC looked on greedily. But what were they to do? Batman had run its course, so they couldn't go to that well again. Not yet. No, the choice was clear. It was time to return to the man who stood for truth, justice and the American way. It was time to go back to Superman.
I watched on the sidelines as Warners Brothers assembled one of the more eclectic film crews. First of all, they turned the franchise over to the men who had revitalized Batman, Christopher Nolan and David S. Goyer, who then in turn brought on Zack Snyder (300) to direct. The cast included a group of actors I never would have associated with a comic book movie: Amy Adams, Laurence Fishburne, Michael Shannon, Diane Lane, Russell Crowe, and Kevin Costner. As each new cast member was announced, I grew more intrigued. And I was very happy when Henry Cavill got the nod to play the Man of Steel himself. He's an actor I have liked for a long time (despite the atrocity on mankind that was Immortals).
So I was tentatively excited, but I was also worried. I kept hearing that this was a "new" take on the legendary hero, re-invented to be in the world we live in today. Being dark and gritty might work for Batman, but not Superman. Superman is heroic, he's bold, he's big. He is not darkness. He is the light. That's the whole point. So I was really worried when I saw the dark palate of the film, the grim tones, the darker suit. I was willing to give the movie a chance, though.
So how did they do? Not bad, actually. My worst fears were not realized. First of all, the re-invented, more "realistic" approach is actually pretty well done. While they do change some elements from the origin story, they don't go off the reservation. They stay true to the most important plot points - the planet Krypton explodes, but not before brilliant scientist Jor-El launches his infant son into space...the ship eventually crash lands on Earth and is raised by an All-American family in Kansas, the Kents. This is where the story diverges a bit. Nolan and Goyer want to know what it would really be like for an all-powerful alien to grow up in today's America. In many ways, he would be an outcast. He doesn't know who he is. He can't reveal what he can do. His senses - heat and x-ray vision, super hearing, massive strength - these are all overpowering and he can't control them. Instead of encouraging him to use his powers someday for good, his adoptive parents actually try to get him to hide his abilities because they think people wouldn't understand. They would be afraid. And they're probably right. So young Superman grows up, wandering around, hiding his powers, trying to find his place in the world. Lucky for us, he finds it right before the evil Kryptonian General Zod, who also survived the planet's destruction, arrives on Earth, ready to raise some hell!
I have to say that despite some problems, I was enjoying the first half of the film. Sure, the opening battle sequence is completely unnecessary, and I was really annoyed by the overuse of shaky cam (why do we need shaky cam in dialogue scenes?!?!). But for the most part, I was rolling with the movie. A few folks have complained that the Krypton scenes focused too much on science fiction, but that didn't bother me. In fact, I felt that some of the science fiction elements actually brought the movie more in line with the comics. I was generally pleased that Zach Snyder avoided his normal stylistic tricks, but kept with a more simple filmmaking approach (despite the shaky cam). And the movie's biggest asset is its risky but brilliant casting. Along the board, I was really impressed. Cavill is a really solid Superman, Shannon is having a ball chewing the scenery as the villain, Lane and Fishburne are great in the limited screen time they have, and Adams fits into Lois Lane's shoes perfectly, and makes her much more intelligent than some of the other Lois Lanes we've known. And Costner and Crowe are pitch perfect as the fathers: Costner perfectly embodies the American spirit while Crowe manages to gracefully settle into a more Obi wan Kenobi type role.
So I was starting to enjoy the movie...and then the punching began. And it didn't stop for what seemed like 7 hours. The climactic battle of the film is one of the most over-the-top, destructive, ridiculous, and monotonous battle sequences I have ever seen. The effects all look terrific, but when they feature nothing but someone punching someone else through a building over and over and over again, it gets really old. Look, I appreciate that modern special effects finally give us a chance to see super heroes wail on each other...but when they are actually unable to hurt each other, it gets old. And by the time I saw the 783rd building collapse, I checked my watch and just thought, please let this battle be over soon. Please! But it didn't stop. It just kept on going on and on. And with each punch, I cared less and less.
It's kind of a shame because the first battle with the evil Kryptonians in Kansas is actually pretty inventive, with the combatants using their various powers in different ways. Superman tries to fight off two warriors, clearly better trained than he is, though not as powerful, while simultaneously trying to protect the U.S. military (who are actually attacking all three of them). It's a fun sequence, and certainly massive enough in scale to be a worthy climax in any other movie. But we still have an hour to go!
I just wanted someone to stop punching and say a line of dialogue. Just any line of dialogue would do.
Clearly, as the movie went on, I liked it less and less. It wasn't just the fighting. The storyline kind of goes a bit flaky, with weird plotting, and just blah dialogue. It's almost as if the writers got to the halfway point of the movie and said, "whew, we got this far. The CGI guys can take it from here."
MINOR SPOILERS HERE BELOW. I also don't like how the battle ends. I don't want to ruin anything so I will try to be vague, but I don't like the way Superman wins the battle. The filmmakers go out of their way to justify the move and it makes sense in the context of the film, I suppose, but it also goes against over 80 years of Superman history. He just wouldn't do that. And that bothered me.
But what annoyed me most about the ending is that we have a cute little scene at the Daily Planet, with Clark Kent, Perry White, and Lois Lane all going to work and smiling, as if nothing had happened, as if the whole damn city had not just been torn to smithereens. There was such wanton destructiveness, with over-zealous special effects guys demolishing massive amounts of the city with explosions that easily would have killed tens of thousands of people, and it's as if nothing had happened. Nothing at all. Everyone is all smiles. The movie has zero consequences. And I actually found that to be irresponsible. And it pissed me off. Nolan and Goyer are better than that.
SPOILERS OVER.
Last thing I hated is the complete misguided score by Hans Zimmer. Though it isn't thematically strong, I enjoyed his Batman scores and understood how his music fit the mood of Nolan's Gotham. But he is completely out of his element here. He has a nice, ascending motif which sounds heroic enough but it builds to nothing. The rest of the score is cheap sounding synth tracks with some dated guitar overlays from the 1990s. Even if this movie is more grounded and realistic, Superman is still Superman. And that still requires music that is big and bold. And I don't want to hear the excuse that no one writes music like that any more. There are composers who do it well. Listen to what Giacchino did with Star Trek and John Carter. Heck, listen to the superb score John Ottman gave Superman Returns. Zimmer mentioned in interviews that he initially didn't think he was the right man for the job. He should have listened to his own instincts.
Anyways, enough rambling. So where does this leave me? Did I like Man of Steel? Sort of. There is a lot to like here. Goyer and Nolan's take on the character is interesting, the casting is superb, and Snyder's direction is confident. But there is so much that bothers me. It's really a mixed bag. And while the movie has been a huge hit, and the studio is already cooking up a sequel, Warner Brothers had better do better the next go-around. Because if they make another movie as mixed as this one, they will never reach the heights that Marvel has ascended to.
BEST LINE:
Superman: My father believed that if the world found out who I really was, they would reject me out of fear. He was convinced that the world wasn't ready. What do you think?
MVP:
Of all the stars in the film, I definitely liked Coster and Crowe the best. But I'm not picking either of them for my MVP. Rather, my MVP is going to the one non-star in the bunch, the up-and-coming German actress, Antje Traue, who plays General Zod's second-in-command, Faora-Ul. She is one tough cookie, full of malevolence without resorting to scenery chewing. But what impressed me is that she made this much of an impression when she is such an underwritten character. There is nothing on paper that really sets her apart. But the fact that the character is so memorable is a testament to Traue's acting. The second she walks onto the screen, her presence just draws your attention - and that's impressive when she is mostly sharing the screen with seasoned pros like Crowe and Shannon. She's my clear MVP. It doesn't hurt that her big fight with Superman in Kansas is easily the highlight battle of the film.
TRIVIA:
Henry Cavill has the worst luck. He was always directors' second choice. He was the frontrunner in an earlier Superman reboot, but that project fell through and the studio went with Bryan Singer's Superman Returns instead, with Brandon Routh as the title character. He was the second choice for James Bond before Eon went with Daniel Craig. He was the second choice for Twilight's Edward Cullen before the studio chose Robert Pattinson. And he was also runner-up behind Christian Bale for Batman. I'm glad a franchise finally came through for him!
