Sunday, February 15, 2015
BOND...JAMES BOND
Bond is my franchise. Let me just get that out there. It was something I realized around the time of Casino Royale (2006). As a child of the 1980s, I grew up in a time when franchises were really beginning to explode, and I was raised on a healthy diet of Star Wars, Star Trek, Indiana Jones and James Bond. Since then, I have seen all of these franchises hit some dark days. In fact, in some ways, I'm not sure I want those franchises to survive. I think many of us would agree that the Star Wars prequels and Kingdom of the Crystal Skull almost killed Star Wars and Indiana Jones, respectively (even if they did make a lot of money). We'll see what Disney has in store for these series moving forward, but my expectations are not that high. And Star Trek, while I like the cast and found the first reboot to be genuinely entertaining, was not really Star Trek to me. It felt more like J.J. Abrams' demo reel to get the Star Wars gig.
So why do I prefer Bond to those others? Longevity and consistency. Look, there is not a single James Bond film that is as good the original Star Wars Trilogy, Raiders of the Lost Ark, or Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. No Bond film even comes close to hitting the triumphant peaks that those films reached. And yet, the character and the formula of Bond endures. And unlike other franchises, there doesn't seem to be a lot of second guessing. If Eon Productions makes a bad Bond film, they shrug their shoulders, fix what isn't working, and then move on to the next one. There is comfort in that consistency.
There is also the matter of Bond himself. I hear Disney is rebooting Indiana Jones with a new actor in the lead. That's not gonna work. Indiana Jones is Harrison Ford. Bond is bigger than any of the actors who played him. He has entered the territory of Sherlock Holmes, Dracula, and other icons who are far more important than the actors who are playing them. I think that is an important point that needs to be made.
As far as I'm concerned, the Indiana Jones series ended with The Last Crusade. Star Wars only had three films that ended in 1983, and Star Trek was ruined by the Next Generation's cast moving to the big screen (three out of those four films were garbage, and even the good one, First Contact, was only okay).
Nope. It's official. Bond is my franchise.
One of the longest continuing film series in history, James Bond was the literary creation of Ian Fleming, a British author who had spent time as a naval intelligence officer in World War 2. While his war service was nowhere near as adventurous as Bond's career, it did give the books a bit of authenticity. I always felt that Bond was the spy Fleming wished he could have been, but that might just be me reading into it too much! Either way, the books were hits, and it didn't take long for Hollywood to come calling.
The first Bond adaptation was the Casino Royale episode of the Climax TV show. It featured Barry Nelson as American (not British) spy James Bond and weaselly Peter Lorre as the villainous Le Chiffre. I think most people just consider Casino Royale as an interesting side note and mark the true beginning of Bond's cinematic career when producers Harry Saltzman and Cubby Broccoli teamed up in 1962 to make Dr. No. And that is where I will begin my reviews.
I plan on watching all these films and reviewing them in order, and ranking them as I go. It will be fascinating to watch the series change as the decades pass, always riding a wild roller coaster from fairly serious and realistic to over-the-top special effects bonanzas, and then back again, always staying current by cashing in on current trends (including even Blaxploitation, Kung Fu and the Star Wars films) and continually riding on the timeless coattails of one of the most entertaining characters in movie history. This is going to be fun.
So let's get going!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment