Showing posts with label John Krasinski. Show all posts
Showing posts with label John Krasinski. Show all posts
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Promised Land
Promised Land
No!!!! So close, Hollywood, so close!
When I first heard about Promised Land, I thought, "ah, another Hollywood, environmental, anti-corporation" movie. I get tired of these films because the politics are so one-sided. And it doesn't matter if I agree with the political stance or not (in fact, I often do). My problem is that some of these films are telling me what I am supposed to think and then tells me I am a close-minded, foolish simpleton if I disagree. Personally, I don't think that is a very good way to start a dialogue on a serious topic. In fact, that kind of myopic view is part of the problem in Washington D.C. today.
So I was surprised when I started watching Promised Land, and it did the unexpected and actually tackled the topic in an intelligent and though-provoking way! Matt Damon plays Steve Butler, who works for Global Crosspower, an energy company focusing on extracting natural gas through a method called fracking. Steve's job is to go to these small towns, generally full of farmers, and convince them to lease their farmland to Global by offering profit sharing deals. The town, hit with hard economic times, is of course enthusiastic until an old farmer/teacher Frank Yates (Hal Holbrook) brings up major environmental concerns at a town hall meeting. Steve's job gets even more difficult when a bothersome activist Dustin Noble (John Krasinski) rolls into town to start a grassroots campaign against Global.
For a good chunk of the runtime, I was rolling with Promised Land, which is buoyed by a terrific cast, which also includes the great Francis McDormand and Rosemary DeWitt, working with a nice script co-written by Damon and Krasinski, and under the sure hand of director Gus van Sant (who also directed Damon's Good Will Hunting). And I was impressed with the movie's mature take on the fracking issue. Steve is presented not as a corporate stooge, but as a real three dimensional character who believes in what he is saying. He came from a small farm town. The life blood of the town was a local factory and when that factory closed down, the town just withered away and died. Steve still seems shell shocked about his childhood, and he honestly believes that fracking is a way out for the dying small town. Sure, there is a small chance that something horrible could happen, environmentally, but maybe it is worth the risk so that money can be pumped into these small towns. The other side of that argument comes from Dustin Noble and Frank Yates. The environmental risk is not small and the invasive measures used by fracking companies will destroy the land, destroy the livestock, destroy the farms, and ultimately destroy the town. Both sides are committed to their argument and I admired that they seemed to be letting the audience make up their own mind.
Sort of a spoiler here: then suddenly the movie decides to throw the audience a curveball in a twist so blatantly ridiculous that it ruins the whole movie, taking everything intelligent about the debate and turning into a diatribe about how corporations are manipulating the world and destroying America. This was infuriating because it undermines the film, which up to this point had really been working. Look, I am not deluding myself. I knew the movie was anti-fracking, but by presenting a logical discussion and actually addressing the opposition's perfectly reasonable arguments, the movie was able to prove its point and hopefully convince people on the fence. But the twist at the end alienates those in the middle and when that happens, you are just preaching to the choir and you're not going to convince anyone of anything. Maybe if the twist had been handled better, I wouldn't have been so annoyed, but the script and direction just start to flounder here, despite the cast's best efforts. Very frustrating experience. What a shame.
MVP:
Promised Land also one other flaw. It tries to shoehorn a love triangle into the film, with both Dustin and Steve chasing the same woman, a local school teacher named Alice, played by Rosemary DeWitt. Beyond the Hollywood contrivance of this rivalry, it also bothered me because it made Alice a weak character - would she just randomly go out with anyone as long as they came from out of town? But I only noticed this afterwards because Rosemary DeWitt's performance is so good. She is a strong and confidant woman, full of good humor and grace, and you can see why Steve and Dustin would both be chasing her. In fact, it is a bit odd that everyone else in the town is not chasing her. It's a fine performance and she completely charmed me, elevating the love story scenes from their inherent cliché nature. It doesn't hurt that she has remarkable chemistry with Matt Damon. So all in all, a win for Rosemary DeWitt! A decisive MVP win.
BEST LINE:
STEVE: I'm begging you, don't do this. Because the truth is we will walk away. We always do. And then after every single town within three states has signed up and with the blows of this economy almost unbearable, we'll come back. And we'll offer you nothing. Every lease we've signed, every piece of the pie we've offered. It all goes away...and we will buy this place for nothing.
TRIVIA:
This film was supposed to be Matt Damon's directorial debut. But with a very short time to prepare for the film (and because of some rumored creative conflicts), Damon stepped down as director and Gus van Sant came onboard.
Saturday, January 23, 2010
It's Complicated
It's ComplicatedI'm not going to ease into this review. It's Complicated just isn't good. Despite the best efforts of a terrific cast (including Meryl Streep, Alec Baldwin, Steve Martin, and John Krasinsky), the movie just does not work.
The storyline has promise. Jane (Streep) is a divorced woman whose ex-husband Jake (Baldwin) wants back in the marriage. Ten years previously, he had an affair and left Jane for some young hottie. But now that young hottie is his wife and she wants a kid, and Jake seems to be re-evaluating his life. He realizes that he made a horrible mistake in leaving Jane. Jane can't seem to resist and an affair ignites between the two. Will she end up with her old husband or will she go for the nice architect (Martin) who also seems to be interested in her? Will she be able to sort out her conflicting feelings? Oh, it's so complicated!
There is some room for drama here. In theory, I can understand why divorcees may re-unite. Feelings can re-surface; they may be co-mingled with pain and regrets, but the fact remains this man used to be her husband and there was once a lot of love. I understand that conflicting emotions and the right set of circumstances could lead her back to him. Except the script is so shallow and the circumstances so unconvincing that it really makes no sense. You are asking yourself the entire movie, Why? Why? Why? And that's not a good thing.
The movie is a pretty big hit, though, and a lot of folks are really liking it. These people argue with me on two points. 1) It's a romantic comedy! So what if it is impossible! To which I argue - yes, it is a romantic comedy, but it is also presented with a layer of reality. This isn't like the old divorce screwball comedies of old that are so clearly superficial and woven in romantic fantasy that it all makes sense. Writer-director Nancy Meyers is not making that type of movie. She is trying to be real and funny at the same time. Sometimes that works (I rather liked her Something's Got to Give), but she can't have it both ways this time.
The other point is 2) this movie is not meant for me. I just don't get it because I'm not a middle-aged woman. To which I argue - well, I can't argue with that. This movie is not meant for me. I like to think I could still review the movie objectively, but I thought maybe these criticisms were right - until I talked to three of my friends who ARE middle-aged women and they had all the same problems I did. Whew!
I sort of feel bad trashing the movie. It's not all bad. I have a lot of respect for Nancy Meyers, who seems to be one of the very few filmmakers in Hollywood writing real roles for women these days. And the acting is all quite good. Streep is, as always, rock solid. If she can't quite overcome the weakness of her character, it is not her fault. Alec Baldwin is like Puck going through a mid-life crisis, and he puts in a rakishly entertaining performance. Steve Martin is restrained and quiet, and it's nice to see him playing a different type of character. And John Krasinski (Jim on "The Office") is very funny as the Jane and Adam's future son-in-law who accidentally finds out about their affair and is desperately trying to keep the secret. There are some good scenes - including a pretty funny party scene that I don't want to spoil - that almost makes the movie worth watching. Almost. It's just a shame that the cast is saddled down by this story.
So there you go. It's Complicated is not complicated enough. And with the talent involved, it really should have been better.
MVP: Do I have to give an Most Valuable Player to a movie I didn't like? Sigh. I guess it would be Baldwin. Baldwin is pretty funny. And if he had played this character in a movie that fully embraced its silly, romantic comedy roots, a la Awful Truth, then he would be right at home. I like that his performance implies a mid-life crisis without talking about it. He is just a big ol' kid who is in denial about his life. I don't see any of this in the dialogue, but the way. It's all in his acting. Plus, it's always nice to see Baldwin having fun - which is the main reason I watch "30 Rock" every week.
TRIVIA: Meryl Streep asked her alma mater Vasser College if the production could film the graduation scene on their campus. The College flatly refused - despite the fact that Streep is on the College's Board of Trustees and that two of her children also attend the school!
BEST LINE: At a dinner party, there is some tension between Baldwin and Streep's characters who just had a fight. John Krasinski tries to distract every one else by trying to force feed every one wine, but he is just pretty much ignored. Near the end of the scene, he makes one final attempt and says, "Hey, why am I the only one drinking wine???" It was funny...I guess you had to be there...
Labels:
Alec Baldwin,
John Krasinski,
Meryl Streep,
Nancy Meyers,
Steve Martin
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
