Why do I do this to myself?
I think there is something wrong with me. There are a lot of movies I have never seen before that are considered genuine classics, iconic films like Mr. Smith Goes To Washington, Gandhi, and Stagecoach. And there are also some films that I haven't seen in decades that I have always wanted to see again.
So how do I keep finding myself in this situation? One day, The Tartars popped up on TCM and I immediately DVR'd it. I am a sucker for an epic, even a bad one. And while I didn't know a lot about The Tartars, I did know its reputation wasn't very good. The film stars Orson Welles (Citizen Kane), who is clearly here just to collect a paycheck, Victor Mature (The Robe), an actor I've never particularly liked, and it was directed by Richard Thorpe (Ivan Hoe), a director I have also never particularly liked. And within 2 minutes of watching the movie, I knew I was in deep trouble.
And I looked over at my movie shelf and all those good movies I had to watch. And then I looked back at the TV and the cheap costumes and bad dubbing, and decided to settle in for the night and finish watching this train wreck.
What is wrong with me?
The Tartars is the story of Oleg (Mature), a Viking king settled in Russia. He is allied with the Tartar khan, Togrul. When Togrul announces his intention to invade the Slavs, Oleg refuses. The Slavs are also allied to the Vikings and Oleg refuses to break his word. I suppose he could have been diplomatic about the whole thing, but instead he ramps up the insults, kills the khan and kidnaps his daughter Samia (Bella Cortez), bringing her back to his fortress as a hostage. The khan's brother Burundai (Welles) ascends to the throne of the Tartars and now must decide how to deal with these meddlesome Vikings who won't bend to his sword. Stupid stuff proceeds to happen.
Where to start. Well, I think it is important to mention this is a peplum film. Basically, this refers to low budget Italian films, usually set in the ancient or medieval world, where the Italian studios would fly in Hollywood star to headline the picture and guarantee some sort of box office return. The rest of the actors were all Italians and were dubbed, often poorly, into English before the film was released back in the U.S. Though there had been some earlier peplum films, the genre really exploded when bodybuilder Steve Reeves played Hercules in 1958, which was a huge box office hit. Suddenly, horribly cheap Italian films were all the rage. And Hollywood's studios, which were getting battered by television, were desperately trying to find ways to make oodles of cash with very little investment. Well, MGM decided to get in on the act and sent over an over-the-hill actor in Mature who at this point in his career was more interested in playing golf, as well as one of their more reliable directors, Richard Thorpe. To guarantee they had a good actor playing the villain, they also hired Orson Welles, who was desperately trying to raise cash for his own projects.
But I do want to make an important point about peplum films - just because they are low budget doesn't mean they all necessarily bad. There was some really talented filmmakers working in the genre, including Sergio Leone, who directed the fun Colossus of Rhodes with Rory Calhoun. Sadly, I don't think any of those people worked on this movie.
Almost everything about this movie is terrible. And I think it starts with Richard Thorpe. I know he was considered a solid filmmaker who made a lot of hits for MGM, but I have always found his style to be slow and plodding. The story is ridiculous and the acting across the board is atrocious.
Hey, at least the Khan's palace was cool. That was a really good set. And the matte painting that shows the fortress in its full magnificence is kind of neat. There is a random Viking named Sigrum, played by Furio Meniconi, who has a line or two. I liked that guy. Arnoldo Foá plays an advisor to the Khan and he is appropriately wise and stoic.
And yeah, that's about it? So how about everything else?
This film is so miscast. Victor Mature might be the worst cast Viking I have ever seen, and his character is a relatively inept and ineffective ruler. I think he was chosen to rule the Vikings because he is the only one brave enough to never wear pants.
Orson Welles isn't cast much better. He at least delivers his lines with appropriate menace, but he is never believable as a warrior chieftain. And his stunt double is even worse. It's just a short guy that they stuffed into a costume which looks like it was then inflated with helium. The final fight between the antagonists is almost sad, as the two try to swing cheap swords at each other, one desperately trying to keep his wig on as the other tries to swing his arms from inside his balloon. I stared at the screen in disbelief.
Oh, something else. Spoiler alert for those who have made it this far! This film seemingly takes place over a week or two. Oleg has a brother named Eric (Luciano Marin) who falls in love with the imprisoned Samia. Even though Eric is the one who killed her father, she quickly succumbs to his advances and they decide to get married. The very next time we see the lovebirds, seemingly the next day, Samia asks if the Vikings will let her stay now that she is pregnant. I'll admit, I don't know a lot about the Tartars. Maybe their pregnancy tests really were that good. Seems awful quick to me, though.
I can keep going, but I won't. I need to put this behind me. I need to calm myself, reset and breathe, and re-evaluate my life. Why do I feel the need to torture myself this way? How can I stop myself?
But then I glance up at my DVR...and I see Steve Reeves' Son of Spartacus is about to start on TCM...and I feel myself reaching for the record button...
MVP:
I really think I am going to Furio Meniconi, who plays one of the Vikings named Segrum. He just appears occasionally in the background and even has a line of dialogue every once in awhile. At first, I just thought he was a cool looking dude with a cool hair and a cool beard. He actually looked like he knew what he was doing when he swung a sword. So, points for him.
Then later in the movie, maybe about 30-minutes from the end, you realize he is Oleg's right hand man. I hadn't realized that, but that would have been good to know. And then 15-minutes from the end, he has a short speech where he says that he helped raise Oleg and Eric and he wished the brothers would stop arguing. And again, I thought, well, that would have been interesting to know earlier. Never mind the fact that he looks the same age as Victor Mature.
Anyways, he still looks cool. So he gets my MVP.
BEST LINE:
This dialogue isn't that great, but like I mentioned, Orson Welles provides the right amount of menace in his performance. It helps when you have one of the coolest voices in all of Hollywood history!
Burundia: Why should I spare you, then? You give me no choice. I, who stand on the threshold of glory...What does your little life mean to me?
Ciu Lang: Less than nothing. It means no more to me. We have no choice in the matter of death. It comes for us all.
Burundai: You seem to desire your own.
Ciu Lang: No, I have no desire. I follow the way.
Burundai: The way. Your way is mystic humbug. It leads nowhere. Mine is forward...into greatness.
TRIVIA:
We had a wasted opportunity with this film. Victor Mature and Orson Welles had hated each other since the 1940s when they were both competing for the affections of Rita Hayworth. They really could have used that antagonism to their benefit and played up the tension between the two. But sadly, I think that would have required better actors, a better director and a better script. Or perhaps a different movie, altogether.
