Saturday, November 21, 2015
Octopussy
Octopussy
For Your Eyes Only was a divisive film in my group of friends - they found it tedious and frustrating, whereas I appreciated the return of a semi-realistic tone to the franchise and truly believe that just a few missteps derail it from being a great film (though they are pretty big missteps, to be fair). Roger Moore's next film Octopussy ended up being even more divisive - only this time, it is my friends and me against pretty much the rest of the world!
A British secret service agent is murdered, dressed as a clown and carrying a fake faberge egg (basically a very fancy, jeweled egg). It's all very peculiar, so James Bond is sent in to investigate. Of course, his sleuthing introduces him to a whole gaggle of villains, including exiled Afghan prince Kamal Khan (Louis Jourdan) and his right hand man Gobinda (Kabir Bedi), as well as a circus run by a mysterious and dangerous woman named Octopussy (Maud Adams). Leaping from London to India to Germany, Bond has to discover why these villains need something as rare as a faberge egg and how that all connects to a renegade Russian general named Orlov (Steven Berkoff), who wants to ignite the Cold War into a hot one.
A lot of people point to Octopussy as an example of all that is wrong with the Roger Moore years. And they point to very specific things - silly gadgets (alligator submarine, anyone?), unbelievable action (that silly fight in the Indian market), and ridiculous jokes (there is a Tarzan yell that is frankly unforgivable). Plus, Roger Moore is looking too old to be wooing such young women and throwing punches. He looks more likely to throw his back out.
I can't defend against any of these points. These specific moments are indeed bad, and Roger Moore is starting to look a bit long in the tooth. But if are trying to find an example of over-the-top Bond shenanigans that go too far, then look no further than Moonraker. After that space epic, the Bond films actually came back down to Earth and became more realistic. Octopussy has these absurd and ridiculous moments, but they are only moments. For the most part, this is more of a Cold War thriller that tonally is feels like it has more in common with Goldfinger and Thunderball than Spy Who Loved Me and Moonraker.
There is a lot to like here. The pre-credits scene is terrific. The villains - especially Jourdan and Berkoff, are chewing scenery like they were told they'd never get a chance to act again, and they are both very entertaining. Roger Moore is looking a bit old, but I think he is still able to hold his own. As for the Bond girl, the producers were wise to cast Maud Adams (in her second Bond film after Man with the Golden Gun). Though 13-years younger than Moore, she exhibits a maturity and authority that makes her the perfect romantic partner for an aging super spy. I actually think she is the best Bond girl of the entire Roger Moore run.
Also, John Barry makes a stunning return to the franchise and delivers another brilliant score. The stunts are exciting, much of the humor actually is funny, and some of the gadgets are actually pretty cool (buzzsaw yoyo? Hell yes!). Octopussy also presents what is easily one of the most tense moments of the Roger Moore run, when Bond has to get to diffuse a nuclear bomb in the circus. It's just a terrific scene.
I don't love Octopussy, but I think it is woefully underrated. It's a worthy entry to the franchise and is way better than its reputation. I was pleased that my group of friends agreed. We just don't get it. Why all the hate?
I think it must be that damn Tarzan yell.
RANKINGS:
This one is tough. There is a lot I don't like in Octopussy, but large portions of it work really quite well. And it is hard for me to ignore the nostalgia factor, as much as I want to. Octopussy was probably the first Bond film I saw, and it was on a constant rotation in my house growing up. Despite the fact that most people put it near the bottom, I'm putting it firmly in the middle. The big question is which side of For Your Eyes Only should it be on? When both films are good, I think Octopussy might be better. When both films are bad, well, they are equally bad. So I think that gives Octopussy the slight edge - and yes, I know I just made a big deal about For Your Eyes Only having the potential to be Moore's best Bond film. But the reality is I think Octopussy is just a little bit better.
1. Thunderball
2. From Russia With Love
3. Goldfinger
4. The Spy Who Loved Me
5. Dr. No
6. Octopussy
7. For Your Eyes Only
8. Live and Let Die
9. Man with the Golden Gun
10. Diamonds are Forever
11. On Her Majesty's Secret Service
12. Moonraker
13. You Only Live Twice
BEST LINE:
This is an easy one, even if it is just a one word line of dialogue. It's all in Louis Jourdan's seedy and scenery chewing delivery: "Octopussy."
TRIVIA:
1983 was the year that Kevin McClory was supposed to get his payback. After decades of litigation, he finally got the rights to the James Bond story "Thunderball" which he had co-written with Ian Fleming in the 1950s. He also won the rights to SPECTRE and Bond's arch nemesis Ernst Blofeld. And now he was finally going to get to work on producing his own Bond film - even if it was going to be technically a remake of 1965's Thunderball. McClory even managed a huge coup when he convinced Sean Connery to return to the iconic role that had made him a star. The new Bond film, called Never Say Never Again as a joke about Connery's refusal to play Bond ever again, was going to come out the same summer as Eon's Octopussy. It was going to be a battle of the Bonds. For Roger Moore and Sean Connery, who were good friends, it was a friendly competition. But there was bad blood between Team McClory-Connery and Team Broccoli. And I wouldn't be surprised if both sides were out for blood.
And sure enough, the allure of Sean Connery returning to the role made waves at the box office. The film grossed $55 million in 1983, which is pretty impressive. Of course, Octopussy grossed $67 million. Sure, everyone knows that Connery is the best Bond, but let's never forget that when the two actors went head-to-head, Roger Moore won the fight!
MVP:
This one is tricky. Roger Moore is good as usual, though he is definitely starting to show his age. Maud Adams is terrific as the title character, and John Barry gave us his last truly great Bond score. But ultimately, I think the winner has to be the Acrostar - one of the coolest vehicles of the franchise, probably just behind the Aston Martin in Goldfinger and the Lotus in The Spy Who Loved Me. The Acrostar is the tiny jet that Bond uses in the beginning of the film to take on the Cuban military. Super sleek and insanely fast, this mini jet is just amazingly cool. I wanted one when I was 8...and I kinda still want one today. It's just pretty damn awesome.
Labels:
James Bond,
John Barry,
John Glen,
Louis Jourdan,
Maud Adams,
Roger Moore
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)